Success Stories

Lost 85 lbs
Click here to see more success stories!


Weight Loss Surgery Options


The American Society for Bariatric Surgery describes two basic approaches that weight loss surgery takes to achieve change:

  1. Restrictive procedures that decrease food intake.
  2. Malabsorptive procedures that alter digestion, thus causing the food to be poorly digested and incompletely absorbed so that it is eliminated in the stool.

Gastric Restrictive Procedure
Malabsorptive Procedures
Combined Restrictive & Malabsorptive Procedure
Laparoscopic or Minimally Invasive Surgery

Gastric Restrictive Procedure These procedures work by limiting the amount of food you can eat while at the same time controlling hunger. They do nothing to change the way your body digests food, food consumed passes through the digestive tract in the usual order allowing it to be fully absorbed into the body so the risks of malnutrition are reduced.

  • Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric band (Lap Band)  In this procedure, no tissue is cut or stapled. An adjustable band is placed high on the stomach, where the esophagus enters into the stomach.
    The band is adjusted down to create a restriction limiting how quickly food can pass into the stomach. This causes the patient to feel full quickly, being satisfied with only a small amount of food.

  • Sleeve Gastrectomy  In this procedure, the outer two thirds of the stomach is removed leaving a long narrow "stomach tube" which limits the amount of food you can eat and  causes the patient to feel full quickly, being satisfied with only a small amount of food.  In addition to physically limiting the amount of food you can eat, the operation removes the portion of the stomach that produces the appetite hormone Ghrelin. This further reduces the desire to eat.  There is no rearranging of the intestines or dumping syndrome as seen with the gastric bypass procedure.

       

    Advantages

    • The primary advantage of restrictive procedures is that the reduced amount of well-chewed food passes through the digestive tract in the usual order. This allows the nutrients and vitamins (as well as the calories) to be fully absorbed into the body, reducing the risk of malnutrition.
    • Since no stomach tissue is cut or stapled with the lap band procedure, the operative risk for this procedure is extreamly low.
    • With the Lap band procedure, the band can be adjusted as an outpatient to increase or decrease restriction.
    • Studies suggest that patients can maintain 50% of targeted excess weight loss with the adjustable band, and 65% of targeted excess weight loss with the sleeve gastrectomy.

    Risks

    • Postoperatively, stapling of the stomach carries with it the risk of staple-line disruption that can result in leakage and/or serious infection. This may require prolonged hospitalization with antibiotic treatment and/or additional operations.
    • The adjustable band may lead to complications of erosion/ perforation, requiring surgical intervention.
    • The band can slip or migrate on the stomach causing obstruction.  This would require surgical repostioning of the band.
    • As is the case with all weight loss surgeries, readmission to a hospital may be required for fluid replacement or nutritional support if there is excessive vomiting and adequate food intake cannot be maintained.

    Malabsorptive Procedures  While these operations also reduce the size of the stomach, the stomach pouch created is much larger than with other procedures. The primary goal is to alter the normal digestive process to produce a calorie wasting process. The anatomy of the small intestine is changed to divert the bile and pancreatic juices so they meet the ingested food closer to the middle or the end of the small intestine. With the three approaches discussed below, absorption of nutrients and calories is markedly reduced resulting in weight loss. Each of the three differs in how and when the digestive juices (i.e., bile) come into contact with the food.

    Since food bypasses the duodenum, all the risk considerations discussed in the gastric bypass section regarding the malabsorption of some minerals and vitamins also apply to these techniques, only to a greater degree.

  • Biliopancreatic Diversion (BPD)  BPD removes approximately 3/4 of the stomach to produce both restriction of food intake and reduction of acid output. Leaving enough upper stomach is important to maintain proper nutrition. The small intestine is then divided with one end attached to the stomach pouch to create what is called an "alimentary limb." All the food moves through this segment, however, not much is absorbed. The bile and pancreatic juices move through the "biliopancreatic limb," which is connected to the side of the intestine close to the end. This supplies digestive juices in the section of the intestine now called the "common limb." The surgeon is able to vary the length of the common limb to regulate the amount of absorption of protein, fat and fat-soluble vitamins.

  • Extended (Distal) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGBP-E)  RYGBP-E is an alternative means of achieving malabsorption by creating a stapled or divided small gastric pouch, leaving the remainder of stomach in place. A long limb of the small intestine is attached to the stomach to divert the bile and pancreatic juices. This procedure carries with it fewer operative risks by avoiding removal of the lower 3/4 of the stomach. Gastric pouch size and the length of the bypassed intestine determine the risks for ulcers, malnutrition and other effects.

  • Biliopancreatic Diversion with "Duodenal Switch" This procedure is a variation of BPD in which stomach removal is restricted to the outer margin, leaving a sleeve of stomach with the pylorus and the beginning of the duodenum at its end. The duodenum, the first portion of the small intestine, is divided so that pancreatic and bile drainage is bypassed. The near end of the "alimentary limb" is then attached to the beginning of the duodenum, while the "common limb" is created in the same way as described above.

    Advantages

    1. These operations often result in a high degree of patient satisfaction because patients are able to eat larger meals than with a purely restrictive or standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure.
    2. These procedures can produce the greatest excess weight loss because they provide the highest levels of malabsorption.
    3. In one study of 125 patients, excess weight loss of 74% at one year, 78% at two years, 81% at three years, 84% at four years, and 91% at five years was achieved.
    4. Long-term maintenance of excess body weight loss can be successful if the patient adapts and adheres to a straightforward dietary, supplement, exercise and behavioral regimen.
    Risks
    1. For all malabsorption procedures there is a period of intestinal adaptation when bowel movements can be very liquid and frequent. This condition may lessen over time, but may be a permanent lifelong occurrence.
    2. Abdominal bloating and malodorous stool or gas may occur.
    3. Close lifelong monitoring for protein malnutrition, anemia and bone disease is recommended. As well, lifelong vitamin supplementing is required. It has been generally observed that if eating and vitamin supplement instructions are not rigorously followed, at least 25% of patients will develop problems that require treatment.
    4. Changes to the intestinal structure can result in the increased risk of gallstone formation and the need for removal of the gallbladder.
    5. Re-routing of bile, pancreatic and other digestive juices beyond the stomach can cause intestinal irritation and ulcers.

    Combined Restrictive & Malabsorptive Procedure  In recent years, better clinical understanding of procedures combining restrictive and malabsorptive approaches has increased the choices of effective weight loss surgery for thousands of patients. By adding malabsorption, food is delayed in mixing with bile and pancreatic juices that aid in the absorption of nutrients. The result is an early sense of fullness, combined with a sense of satisfaction that reduces the desire to eat.

  • Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass  According to the American Society for Bariatric Surgery and the National Institutes of Health, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the current gold standard procedure for weight loss surgery. It is one of the most frequently performed weight loss procedures in the United States. In this procedure, stapling creates a small (15 to 20cc) stomach pouch. The remainder of the stomach is not removed, but is completely stapled shut and divided from the stomach pouch. The outlet from this newly formed pouch empties directly into the lower portion of the jejunum, thus bypassing calorie absorption. This is done by dividing the small intestine just beyond the duodenum for the purpose of bringing it up and constructing a connection with the newly formed stomach pouch. The other end is connected into the side of the Roux limb of the intestine creating the "Y" shape that gives the technique its name. The length of either segment of the intestine can be increased to produce lower or higher levels of malabsorption.

    Advantages

    • The average excess weight loss after the Roux-en-Y procedure is generally higher in a compliant patient than with purely restrictive procedures.
    • One year after surgery, weight loss can average 75% of excess body weight.
    • Studies show that after 10 to 14 years, 50-60% of excess body weight loss has been maintained by most patients.
    • In 2000, study of 500 patients showed that 96% of certain associated health conditions studied (back pain, sleep apnea, high blood pressure, diabetes and depression) were improved or resolved.
    Risks
    • Because the duodenum is bypassed, poor absorption of iron and calcium can result in the lowering of total body iron and a predisposition to iron deficiency anemia. This is a particular concern for patients who experience chronic blood loss during excessive menstrual flow or bleeding hemorrhoids. Women, already at risk for osteoporosis that can occur after menopause, should be aware of the potential for heightened bone calcium loss.
    • Bypassing the duodenum has caused metabolic bone disease in some patients, resulting in bone pain, loss of height, humped back and fractures of the ribs and hip bones. All of the deficiencies mentioned above, however, can be managed through proper diet and vitamin supplements.
    • A chronic anemia due to Vitamin B12 deficiency may occur. The problem can usually be managed with Vitamin B12 pills or injections.
    • A condition known as "dumping syndrome " can occur as the result of rapid emptying of stomach contents into the small intestine. This is sometimes triggered when too much sugar or large amounts of food are consumed. While generally not considered to be a serious risk to your health, the results can be extremely unpleasant and can include nausea, weakness, sweating, faintness and, on occasion, diarrhea after eating. Some patients are unable to eat any form of sweets after surgery.
    • The bypassed portion of the stomach, duodenum and segments of the small intestine cannot be easily visualized using X-ray or endoscopy if problems such as ulcers, bleeding or malignancy should occur.

    Laparoscopic or Minimally Invasive Surgery  For the last decade, laparoscopic procedures have been used in a variety of general surgeries. Many people mistakenly believe that these techniques are still "experimental." In fact, laparoscopy has become the predominant technique in some areas of surgery and has been used for weight loss surgery for several years. Although few bariatric surgeons perform laparoscopic weight loss surgeries, more are offering patients this less invasive surgical option whenever possible.

    When a laparoscopic operation is performed, a small video camera is inserted into the abdomen. The surgeon views the procedure on a separate video monitor. Most laparoscopic surgeons believe this gives them better visualization and access to key anatomical structures.

    The camera and surgical instruments are inserted through small incisions made in the abdominal wall. This approach is considered less invasive because it replaces the need for one long incision to open the abdomen. A recent study shows that patients having had laparoscopic weight loss surgery experience less pain after surgery resulting in easier breathing and lung function and higher overall oxygen levels. Other realized benefits with laparoscopy have been fewer wound complications such as infection or hernia, and patients returning more quickly to pre-surgical levels of activity.

    Laparoscopic procedures for weight loss surgery employ the same principles as their "open" counterparts and produce similar excess weight loss. Not all patients are candidates for this approach, just as all bariatric surgeons are not trained in the advanced techniques required to perform this less invasive method. The American Society for Bariatric Surgery recommends that laparoscopic weight loss surgery should only be performed by surgeons who are experienced in both laparoscopic and open bariatric procedures.

  • Back To Previous Page